Dispenza,
Ledford spar over hospital plan
This
story appeared in the Antelope Valley Press October 11, 2000
By
MICHAEL MARESH
Valley Press
Staff Writer
PALMDALE
- The rift between Mayor Jim Ledford and City Councilman Mike Dispenza over a
the perceived ability of a medi cal group to build a proposed westside hospital
widened Tuesday.
At
a press conference across from City Hall on Tuesday, Dispenza raised his
concerns about reservations he has about the Prospect group's plans for a
hospital at Fifth Street West and Palmdale Boulevard.
At
present, the city could end up committing more than $5 million in city funds to
assist in getting the facility built.
The
Palmdale City Council voted 3-0 Sept. 28 to allow the city to continue to work
with Prospect Medical Holdings Inc., a Los Angeles based medical group.
Dispenza
voted in favor of continuing to work on the project, despite his personal
reservations. Those concerns resulted in conditions being placed into the
agreement.
Dispenza
said after he voiced his concerns to Ledford and Councilman Rod Penner at the
Sept. 28 meeting, conditions were placed in the development agreement so he
would agree.
All
three members of the as-yet three-man council had to give their approval for the
project to move forward.
Dispenza
said the main condition was to allow Prospect more time to produce financial
records that would satisfy the council as a whole. Ledford has been an
enthusiastic supporter of the project.
At
Tuesday's press conference, Dispenza said he needed to clarify some issues on
his stance on the proposed hospital and medical group.
The
councilman listed three reasons why he initially could not vote in favor of the
hospital:
a
city-commissioned report indicated Prospect has never operated a hospital;
a
60-bed hospital was insufficient to meet potential community needs; and
Prospect
could not provide financial proof to show ability to build and operate such a
hospital.
The
report compiled by the Camden consulting group noted that the physicians group
was apparently following a business model that led to insolvency for some other
physicians groups.
The
Prospect physicians group provides service to patient groups that number in the
tens of thousands in the Antelope Valley.
In
addition, Dispenza said, Prospect Medical did not have a business plan or a plan
to recruit physicians.
"I
have been given a leadership role in this matter that I take very
seriously," he said. "My goal is to ensure that the council is given
satisfactory answers before we commit to spending millions of your hardearned
tax dollars. The citizens of Palmdale will not be sold out as long as I sit on
the council."
If
the project comes to fruition, Palmdale would provide $5.2 million in financial
assistance to help Prospect Medical Holdings Inc. to build a $60 million
facility.
But
Prospect, Dispenza said, does not look as if it can deliver what is needed to
complete the hospital, he said.
"I
don't see this as being viable for us," he said. "Prospect needs to be
put under the microscope. They need to answer hard questions."
Dispenza
closed his press conference by saying he was going to pose hard questions to
Ledford.
The
first, he said, was to ask why the council voted before reviewing the city
commissioned Camden report to determine whether Prospect could follow through on
their proposal. The city paid tens of thousands of dollars for the Camden
group's diligence report.
Ledford
later responded to Dispenza's objections, saying the council conditioned its
approval on what it finds out about Prospect.
Ledford
declared his confidence that the city would obtain the information needed from
Prospect.
"That
has to happen," Ledford said.
Dispenza
also asked why Ledford hired the Camden Group if he was going to ignore their
recommendations. Camden, Ledford said, was hired to do the analysis, adding that
he was surprised Dispenza was upset.
"Mike
voted yes," the mayor said. "We both agreed."
On
the issue of whether Prospect has more than $50 million in resources, Ledford
said that needs to be proved to the City Council.
"They
have to provide the money," he said. "We need proof of (their)
finances."
Dispenza
also wanted to know why an exclusive contract was given to a start-up company as
well as the need for the council to vote immediately.
"Everybody
in this Valley is saying give them a chance," Ledford responded, adding
that the Antelope Valley Hospital District supports the concept of Palmdale's
working with Prospect.
"Mike's
questioning his own vote," the mayor said, saying the conditions moving
ahead with Prospect were always in place.
Ledford
also took exception to questions raised about the Prospect deal over whether he
favored the west side of Palmdale over the east side because $5 million would be
given to the westside group under the hospital proposal and only $1 million was
given to fund a partnership with AV Hospital and the County of Los Angeles.
"I
am the only member of the council who lives on the eastside," Ledford said.
He
added that the same offer that was given to the westside was offered to the
eastside, but they declined the offer.
"I
campaigned to bring a hospital to Palmdale," Ledford said. "And I
continually will work with anybody who will try to bring a hospital to Palmdale.
"Mike
voted the same way I did - to move forward."
Ledford
said Prospect deserves the opportunity to prove to the city that it does have
the capital needed to move forward.
"Mike
is dismissing that without giving them a chance," he said.
If
Prospect can prove to the city that it has the necessary funds, the medical
group would build a twostory, 120,000-square-foot hospital with no fewer than 65
beds. The hospital would open by June 2, 2006.
Six
of the 65 beds would be for intensive-care patients and eight would be for labor
and delivery.
The
facility would offer emergency and surgical procedures, including laboratory,
radiology and recovery facilities and respiratory therapy and outpatient care.
The
hospital would be built in conjunction with a separate threestory,
50,000-square-foot building for medical offices and outpatient services.