Lawmaker
wants shuttles to land at Plant 42
Incentives seen
as key to possible aerospace revival
This
story appeared in the Antelope Valley Press March 13, 2001.
By DON JERGLER
Valley Press Aerospace Writer
SACRAMENTO
- Picture a space shuttle landing at Air Force Plant 42 in Palmdale, arriving
for modification and leaving from a one-stop shop.
Now,
add to that the prospect of a robust revival for the aerospace industry in
California, still the state's biggest industry, although it is not nearly as big
as it once was.
Those
were key building blocks of a legislative agenda that Assemblyman George Runner,
R-Lancaster, hopes to push during the coming legislative year.
Among
other things, Runner is forming an Antelope Valley task force to study the
potential for landing space shuttles at Plant 42. Runner made known his
intentions Monday as part of his reappointment to the Select Committee on
Aerospace Industry.
The
select committee was formed three years ago to enhance the state's diminishing
presence in the industry. Runner said he would take an aggressive approach in
pushing for state benefits to promote aerospace work in California.
Runner
said a year of dealing with the governor's office on aerospace issues has given
him more credibility.
"We
have a working relationship," Runner said, adding, "and that then
helps us move together to accomplish the coordinated goals of business
attraction and retention. I think that's their goal; sometimes we just have to
know how to help each other get there."
As
one of his priorities, Runner said he plans to form a task force with the
assistance of the Antelope Valley Board of Trade to look for ways to create
incentives for shuttle landings at Plant 42.
The
shuttle regularly lands at Kennedy Space Center in Florida after missions.
Occasionally, the shuttle lands at Edwards Air Force Base when bad weather
closes the skies over Florida.
Landing
the shuttle at Plant 42 would require upgrades to the facility, but they could
be done at a moderate cost, according to a 1996 study conducted by NASA and USA
(the shuttle partnership of The Boeing Co. and Lockheed-Martin Aeronautics Co.).
The
study concluded that landing the shuttle at Plant 42 and ferrying it back to
Florida for launch is technically feasible.
Landing
at Plant 42 after a mission directly prior to scheduled orbiter modification or
maintenance would eliminate costs of postflight and pre-ferry flight processing
at Kennedy, the study showed.
The
study also concluded that landing shuttles at Plant 42 would drive down costs of
orbiter preparation and ferrying, while also alleviating demand on Kennedy Space
Center facilities and resources.
According
to the study, all necessary Plant 42 modifications could be completed for $21
million.
Two
shuttles have landed at Edwards in the last year.
The
space shuttle Columbia was ferried back to Kennedy after a massive 17-month
upgrade.
Creating
state economic incentives for NASA and Boeing to land the space shuttle at Plant
42 would generate more work in the area and create tourism benefits similar to
those currently enjoyed by Florida.
"To
me, that's kind of the natural next step here," said Runner, R-Lancaster.
"We've got to create a regional interest to express that issue further.
It's clear to me that neither Boeing or NASA will take the initiative on
that."
Interest
in landing the shuttle at Plant 42 has already been expressed on behalf of the
state from Gov. Gray Davis and the California Technology, Trade and Commerce
Agency.
Runner
outlined his priority issues to deal with on the committee this year:
Extend
the Joint Strike Fighter Tax Credit to maximize the opportunities. Runner
introduced Assembly Bill 485 to extend the tax credit's eligibility two years to
conform the tax credit to the current JSF program contract schedule slippage.
Seek
$1.7 million in state funding for the Multi-Axis Thrust Stand to be relocated to
the Air Force Rocket Propulsion Directorate at Edwards Air Force Base from its
current location at NASA Ames. The funding would go to complement $2.4 in
federal funding and is a necessity for testing on the JSF program.
Continue
efforts to increase the Manufacturers Investment Credit. Runner's AB 240 would
increase the MIC from 6% to 7%.
Support
state conformity to federal tax law in the area of the Alternate Research and
Development Tax Credit.
Continue
to support efforts to provide research, development, testing and evaluation of
the next generation of space shuttles in California.
Push
for legislation to unify the California Space Program organizations. The
California Technology, Trade and Commerce Agency is sponsoring legislation to
unify the California space program. The idea is to strengthen existing state
programs to promote California's role as the premier location for space-related
industries, as is the case in other states like Florida.
Seek
more infrastructure funds for rocket test stands at Edwards to attract
propulsion work to the high desert. Runner is asking for $8 million to match
federal funds for completion of refurbishment of rocket test stands so they can
be used for the next generation of rocket testing in California.
Work
with the Antelope Valley Aerospace Alliance to establish the Aerospace Training
Center in Palmdale to meet demands of training in the current high-technology
environment. Runner's AB 1509 has been introduced as the vehicle to achieve this
goal.